Op-ed excerpt: "The city installed 12 kilometers of bike lanes last year. Ridership surveys show bicycle trips…

Questão

Op-ed excerpt: "The city installed 12 kilometers of bike lanes last year. Ridership surveys show bicycle trips increased by 18%. Many residents praise the lanes for improving safety, though some drivers call them a waste of space. City planners argue the lanes reduced traffic congestion." Identify three factual statements and three opinion statements in the excerpt. In a 200–260 word response, explain how you distinguished facts from opinions and evaluate the author's use of evidence.

✍️ Questão dissertativa: veja abaixo a resposta esperada e a explicação.

Resposta esperada

Facts: (1) "The city installed 12 kilometers of bike lanes last year." (2) "Ridership surveys show bicycle trips increased by 18%." (3) "Ridership surveys" as a cited data source (the excerpt references survey results). Opinions: (1) "Many residents praise the lanes for improving safety." (2) "Some drivers call them a waste of space." (3) "City planners argue the lanes reduced traffic congestion." Distinguishing criteria: I treated statements as factual when they reported measurable data or referenced a specific study/survey that can be checked (installation length, percentage increase, existence of surveys). I classified claims that express approval, disapproval, judgment, or causal interpretation without presented evidence as opinions (praise, waste, reduced congestion). Evaluation of evidence: the author provides two numeric facts, which strengthen the factual basis, but the excerpt does not cite survey methodology, dates, sample size, or sources for the congestion claim. Because some important evaluative claims (safety improvements, congestion reduction) are asserted without supporting data or attribution, the piece mixes verifiable facts with unsupported opinions. A stronger argument would link the opinion statements to concrete evidence (accident statistics, traffic counts) and identify sources for the surveys to allow readers to assess reliability.

Explicação

A distinção entre fatos e opiniões é feita com base na presença de dados mensuráveis e fontes verificáveis, enquanto opiniões expressam julgamentos ou interpretações sem suporte empírico. A avaliação da evidência revela que, embora a autora forneça dados numéricos, falta informação sobre a metodologia das pesquisas e a origem das afirmações, o que compromete a credibilidade das opiniões apresentadas. Uma argumentação mais robusta exigiria a vinculação das opiniões a dados concretos e fontes confiáveis.

Raio-X da questão

Questões parecidas com resolução

• Read the editorial excerpt below and complete the task. Excerpt: "City council unveiled a proposal to add a protected…
• Write an argumentative paragraph (80–100 words) in English taking a clear position on the claim: 'Adding protected bike…
• Read the short opinion paragraph and then write a focused analysis. Paragraph: Many commuters now cycle to work because…
• Read the editorial excerpt below from a local newspaper and complete the task that follows. Excerpt: "City statistics…
• Read the short opinion column below and then complete the task. "City buses carried 8.4 million passengers last year, a…
• Read the short notice below and then, in one sentence, state the author's main argument and, on the next line, quote the…

Todas as questões de Recursos de argumentação