In 160–240 words, critically evaluate whether the global predominance of English strengthens or weakens…

Questão

In 160–240 words, critically evaluate whether the global predominance of English strengthens or weakens international scientific collaboration. Include two specific examples (one addressing economic or policy influence) and propose one institutional policy that would improve accessibility for non-English-speaking researchers.

✍️ Questão dissertativa: veja abaixo a resposta esperada e a explicação.

Resposta esperada

The predominance of English both facilitates and constrains collaboration. It strengthens collaboration by providing a common platform for conferences, journals and correspondence, which reduces translation delays and helps form multinational teams (example: multinational clinical trials coordinating protocols in English). Economically and politically, English dominance benefits major publishers and anglophone institutions that set research agendas and influence funding priorities, which can marginalize local priorities and non-English outputs (example: policy reports from global organizations published only in English shaping national strategies). To mitigate harms, institutions should adopt a concrete policy: fund language-access measures such as paid professional editing for non-native authors, mandatory bilingual abstracts, and support for publishing in regional languages with English summaries. This approach preserves the efficiency of a shared language while increasing visibility and equity for diverse research communities.

Explicação

A resposta analisa de forma equilibrada os impactos positivos e negativos da predominância do inglês na colaboração científica, utilizando exemplos concretos que ilustram como isso afeta tanto a comunicação quanto as políticas de pesquisa. Além disso, propõe uma solução prática que visa aumentar a inclusão de pesquisadores que não falam inglês, promovendo a diversidade na produção científica. Essa abordagem abrangente demonstra uma compreensão profunda do tema e sugere caminhos para melhorar a equidade no acesso à pesquisa.

Raio-X da questão

Questões parecidas com resolução

• In English, write a 200–260 word critical response that (1) evaluates how the global dominance of English both…
• In 140–180 words, compare two specific ways English facilitates (1) scientific collaboration and (2) economic or…
• Write a 200–260-word English op-ed assessing how reliance on English in science influences policymaking in…
• Evaluate how dominance of English affects the production, dissemination and debate of scientific knowledge worldwide…
• Write a structured English response (200–260 words) that: 1) analyzes two distinct ways English facilitates the…
• In English, write a well-organized response (160–220 words) that: 1) explains two ways English proficiency influences…

Todas as questões de A língua inglesa e seu papel no intercâmbio científico, econômico e político